![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiB36H77EBEfWlt4gZf0-Z9OAmSdGYKiOMrOHFSa0rU4uydg6QrPfjb_lfpZNwx55TWQ4lyew1UblZKE3_l984vrkyRN0mu2a8mjwySLhLgtujTO0Dn7NJ67fPkxiGs9ZeEWGHWZ_NVKBNN/s400/FixedFabNoFlash2.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBUNpE-f5hGb5fq9eeVgLT5IGPsGFf56g3_lMM77Lte9kTd-p1wZONJ2YEFJPuTbNCznSGOuwa4b7Wsiunov8WFBD67oS1YuuiuOQcWrcogat7xh1blScVhZDA8eAtOLpLDO9lXBDmi3lP/s400/WFlash.jpg)
Part of the job is dealing with the venue rules. This club had a no video/no flash posting on a small sign near the front door. Given this is more of a dinner club than many places like the Viper Room, I was not surprised. But some fans were using little point and shoot cameras and the flash. Nobody said a word so I stuck a few flash shots in. For comparison I offer one each. The shots have very different looks. The club had very low lighting, I was at ISO 3200 wide open 4.5 lens and 1/30th exposure. No way could I shoot at a lower ISO or shutter. These wre shot two seconds apart.
So I ask you to comment which is better to your eye? The top image is without flash, the lower image with flash. Anonymous comments are allowed. No need to register.
2 comments:
I love a no flash pic if the lighting is right, its moody and I love it!!! So of course I prefer the first photo.
I sometimes think that the flash makes it too bright and you lose the mood and the colours.
I totally agree with what Fee said
I take all my band photos without a flash
Post a Comment