![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEisQDVhV7aPVuhWiTm9DK1K3wH3q8fz_-Nd8OkRvwCxmvP0BWlXf3goZFd2xkO3k2tQj1GFxTfuJY54v57mL-NhBcs5QvbPslV5CJJ7rqBBQof3jXnvVrS3u1opDuR3xcl6i0iKZpidNcHa/s400/Toby_flash.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4y56QXZfjMAiIHZSt_9QJ0ZnnfkRPVN9BWD6FlYHWohiqslA836iKOrF21z82OGPiopeb3zbeeeIUN8xDOQLrartLIc56wpIo8ydirbtcVjcsjTOuPGCVaM4XM3mRfsUpQijPXai7Fiyz/s400/Toby_NoFlash.jpg)
These show the sometimes harsh choice between two looks. These were shot a fraction of a second apart. Without flash in these conditions we get a lot of digital noise, far more ugly than film grain. Flash image above, non flash image below. Both are retouched in the usual ways-noise reduced, some red saturation reduced, etc.
1 comment:
Yup still much prefer the Non flash version
Post a Comment